Last week P and I participated in a photo shoot with another photographer and some models. P modeled and I shot my trusty 35mm camera. It was an interesting experience. I had fun shooting the models (something I had never done before) and we definitely got a good work-out from walking around downtown climbing on things for a few hours.
When it was all said and done, I got some great shots (one of my favorite of P is above). I spent a good bit of time editing and carefully selecting the ones I wanted to post. Out of the 96 frames I took, there were 15 I felt great about sharing.
My approach to photography is one of minimalism when it comes to photo editing. I do not believe in using a lot of filters or special effects on my photos. I believe that what makes a good photo is the skill I used in taking it - being able to get the most out of my camera and film and taking the time to frame my shot before I snap the picture. When I edit, I only do a little bit of color correction and some cropping. Not much else. I am not saying that I judge people who use a lot of filters or heavy photo manipulation by any stretch! That's just not my taste.
That being said, the other photographer is one that uses a lot of filters and such. And I as I look at our pictures side by side, I wonder, is my technique dated? Am I being an elitist? Should I jump on this photo manipulation band wagon? Or should I stick to what I find pleasing? I know that the style of the other photographer is currently really popular . . . I just don't know if its right for me.
Here's the link to the album. What do you think?
Meh. I'm not crazy about the filters in that image. I think there are times when photo manipulation can really enhance the overall shot, but many of those feel more like the photographer has a shiny new toy and just wants to use it for everything (see also: everyone on twitter and instagram).
ReplyDeleteMy personal bias is towards image editing that amps up the contrast and really makes the colors pop. : )